I took the chance to poker overnight at the River Rock a few days ago as I was recovering from jetlag, and I had one of the most interesting sessions of my life.
Arriving at 12:30am, right at the start of the Australian Open women's final, I spent the majority of my time at a 1-2 table beside a TV. I thought that the final would keep me entertained and from overplaying my weak hands, and I did not anticipate that I would catch very little tennis throughout the night.
It was a Friday night, and it seemed to me the players were a bit looser and weaker than usual. One person in particular, a very young guy with a scarf, appeared to have trouble learning table etiquette. Other players were explaining the table rules to him when I arrived, such as no string betting (betting with more than one motion), how straddles worked, and that he did not need to show his hand on the river when it was clearly the loser. The young guy also played relatively slowly, acted out of turn, and arranged his chips in stacks of 10, which meant they covered at least twice the surface area of anyone else's.
His friend sat behind him, who apparently doesn't play at all. For the first hour, I fluctuated up and down, mostly playing tight and betting the flop after I raise preflop. I was down after getting involved in a few pots, and added a few more chips to bring myself up to the $300 maximum buy-in, in total putting in $500. It was around 2:00am that I started to realize something was odd about the young guy. He raised preflop every hand, bet continuously unless he was sure he was beat, and projected a very strong table image, despite his novice play habits.
I was lucky to sit two seats behind him, which almost always gave me position. I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he raised on the button or in late position the first few times, but it started to occur to me that this was becoming a regular play. He then revealed one card to show a huge river bluff to his opponent, and my suspicions were finally confirmed when I picked up some online poker lingo that he was conversing with his friend behind him: jam (all-in), and nit (tight).
Feeling I could maneuver him with this information, I selected several hands to play back at him:
1st hand: A suited semi-connector in position. He folds to the 3-bet, saying "always respect the first 3-bet". In the past 2 hours, the only person who had 3-bet was me.
2nd hand: AJo. I 3-bet his button raise from the big blind and he calls.
The flop is Q with two low cards.
I bet. He calls.
Turn is low card.
I check. He bets with a grin.
I fold.
I felt I got floated (called on the flop to have the pot stolen later). He could have had nothing about 50% of the time and a draw or a pair the other 50%. It wasn't worth the cost of raising to find out. It's possible I could have bet the turn, but he folded so rarely up to that point I didn't want to invest to find out. This hand shows the most common disadvantage of playing out of position.
3rd hand: KQhh. I 3-bet him in position and he calls.
The flop comes 10 8 7 with no flush draw.
He checks. I bet. He raises with a grin.
I fold.
This was getting annoying fast.
4th hand: T6dd. I call his raise from the button.
The flop comes J 4 7 rainbow.
He bets. I call.
Turn is K
He checks. I bet. He calls.
River is J.
He bets. I fold. He shows one Q and says that is his highest card.
I tried to float here and he felt he could still steal the pot from me. I was seriously contemplating raising the river bet but I would have had to go all in, meaning I could only represent a big Jack or a full house. He asked me soon after if I folded an Ace and genuinely seemed surprised when I said his Queen beat me.
5th hand: T8 offsuit. I call his raise from late position.
Flop is Q 10 7
He bets. I call.
Turn is Q
He bets. I call.
River is 3.
He bets. I'm laughing inside now and I snap-call.
He mucks (folds without showing) and I muck after him. Like the last hand, he could only represent trips or a full house here. Even Aces might slow down by the river.
More hands go by and we end up at the biggest pot of the night:
6th hand: 89dd. I call his raise from the small blind, and two other players follow.
Flop is 8 7 6 rainbow (flop 40)
I check. Guy 1 bets 20. Guy 2 calls. Young guy raises to 60. I raise to 160. Guy 1 and 2 fold. Young guy calls.
Turn is a 5
I bet 220 with about 200 behind me. Young guy folds.
This was the most difficult hand of the night for both of us. I got extremely lucky to complete my straight and definitely messed up, if not with my betting action, then with my bet sizes. If I check-raised one raise on the flop, I could have all sorts of hands. But I check-raised two raises on the flop, meaning I was representing a huge hand (two pair or better).
The main reason for my raise was because I didn't feel anyone had a strong hand. The young player was constantly aggressive and I couldn't give Guy 1 credit for a huge hand. I felt I was protecting my hand and could also push others off a top pair like Ace 8 or King 8, or perhaps tens and Jacks.
You could argue that if I checked the turn, the aggressive player might have taken a stab at the pot, but if he had a pair, two pair, or a set, would he really turn his hand into a bluff with the river still to come? The most logical scenario for when he would bet on the turn is if he had a straight also (then he would still call or raise a bet from me), or if he had absolutely nothing (which is extremely unlikely considering the flop action).
Betting on the turn is fine. The size could have been smaller but it's hard to argue which number is best since I would show I was committed to going all in no matter what amount I bet.
The young guy tells me later he folded a set, which meant his situation was even worse than mine. Folding on the flop seemed too weak. Raising would fold out weaker hands and only get him all in against sets and straights (and possibly my hand). Calling to evaluate the turn card was a decent option, and he was just unlucky that the 5 put four cards to a straight on the board.
Kudos to him for outplaying me, then making the right fold on the turn.
I later find out that he is an online pro who recently turned 19. It was his first time at the casino, though he acted like a newbie to project a trustworthy, stronger, image. He also string-bet on purpose a lot so that he could appear to want to bet bigger while only committing a small amount of his chips.